When a group needs to converge, Augur reads the conversation through five lenses at once and puts questions back to the group. It asks. People decide.
Each lens is an AI companion working from a different part of the cybernetic and systems tradition. They run in parallel on the same convergence item, so the group sees five different kinds of question side by side instead of one blended summary.
ConversationAre we understanding each other?
Tracks what has been taught back and agreed, and what has only been asserted. Keeps the protocol of the whole exchange.
After Gordon Pask
MeaningWhat is this pointing to?
Reads the issue as a sign and offers hypotheses the group has not yet put into words.
After C.S. Peirce
VarietyCan we respond to what might happen?
Checks whether the options on the table match the range of ways the situation could go.
After W. Ross Ashby
AnticipationWhat future are we acting on?
Makes the group's model of the future explicit, and asks whether a threat touches core function or the capacity to repair.
After Robert Rosen
ProcessWhat is actually becoming?
Reads the transcript afterwards for what is changing, and for anything treated as fixed that is really in motion.
After A.N. Whitehead
Group raises a convergence item→Meaning, Variety and Anticipation pose questions→Group responds and teaches back→Process reading after the session→People, actions and decisions proposed to the graph
Augur is the bridge between the Workshop and the Transducer: the point where a group's sense-making turns into an explicit view of what is coming and what to do about it.